If you think any of this gibberish looks interesting, you should poke around and subscribe to my RSS feed to keep up with new content.
My boss pointed me to this video yesterday from TED. I found it fascinating:
He starts with a very valid premise: we can only do so much good. Which good should we do?
I’m not sure I agree that all good is equal good, however. If we accept that advancing the work in preventing the spread of AIDS is, in essence, the same “good” as the “good” we could do in slowing/altering climate change, then you’ve got a very valid argument here.
In fact, I think he’s got a great argument. I’m just not sure the way he values “good for price” is accurate.
